Harry Cho
Landlord and Tenant Board (LTB) Adjudicator Past Decisions
Overview
662
63
7
3
Order OutcomesPRO
Eviction Relief Granted to Tenant 7 Orders since 2024PRO
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Unlock Full Access to Harry Cho's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Harry Cho typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Lanlord's Notice Found Invalid 3 Orders since 2024PRO
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Unlock Full Access to Harry Cho's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Harry Cho typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Contested Dispute by CategoryPRO
- Substantial Interference25
Landlord Win Rate: 48%
- Personal Use24
Landlord Win Rate: 75%
- Other15
Landlord Win Rate: 73.33%
- Maintenance Issues11
Landlord Win Rate: 63.64%
- Harassment10
Landlord Win Rate: 70%
- Persistent Late Payment9
Landlord Win Rate: 88.89%
Unlock Full Access to Harry Cho's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Harry Cho typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Latest Orders
QIN v WANG
The LTB denied a landlord's request to expedite an eviction for non-payment of rent, confirming that this remedy is not available for rent arrears cases.
Uddin v Milne
A landlord's request to review an order was denied because their agent's mistake at the hearing was not considered a 'serious error' by the LTB.
Digiandomenico v Tripp
LTB denies a landlord's second request to review a decision, citing procedural rules that prohibit multiple reviews of the same order.
An Oshawa tenant's request to review an eviction order for over $15,000 in rent arrears is denied by the LTB.
CAPREIT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v ELUKI
Oshawa tenant's second request to review a non-payment eviction order is denied by the LTB, which confirmed the original decision and advised the tenant to appeal to the Divisional Court.
ALMAJNI v PHILLIPS
Tenant's attempt to overturn a consent eviction order by claiming mental distress during the hearing is denied by the LTB.
QIN v WANG
The LTB denied a landlord's request to expedite an eviction for non-payment of rent, confirming that this remedy is not available for rent arrears cases.
Uddin v Milne
A landlord's request to review an order was denied because their agent's mistake at the hearing was not considered a 'serious error' by the LTB.
Digiandomenico v Tripp
LTB denies a landlord's second request to review a decision, citing procedural rules that prohibit multiple reviews of the same order.
An Oshawa tenant's request to review an eviction order for over $15,000 in rent arrears is denied by the LTB.
CAPREIT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v ELUKI
Oshawa tenant's second request to review a non-payment eviction order is denied by the LTB, which confirmed the original decision and advised the tenant to appeal to the Divisional Court.
ALMAJNI v PHILLIPS
Tenant's attempt to overturn a consent eviction order by claiming mental distress during the hearing is denied by the LTB.
QIN v WANG
The LTB denied a landlord's request to expedite an eviction for non-payment of rent, confirming that this remedy is not available for rent arrears cases.
Uddin v Milne
A landlord's request to review an order was denied because their agent's mistake at the hearing was not considered a 'serious error' by the LTB.
Digiandomenico v Tripp
LTB denies a landlord's second request to review a decision, citing procedural rules that prohibit multiple reviews of the same order.
An Oshawa tenant's request to review an eviction order for over $15,000 in rent arrears is denied by the LTB.
CAPREIT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v ELUKI
Oshawa tenant's second request to review a non-payment eviction order is denied by the LTB, which confirmed the original decision and advised the tenant to appeal to the Divisional Court.
ALMAJNI v PHILLIPS
Tenant's attempt to overturn a consent eviction order by claiming mental distress during the hearing is denied by the LTB.
QIN v WANG
The LTB denied a landlord's request to expedite an eviction for non-payment of rent, confirming that this remedy is not available for rent arrears cases.
Uddin v Milne
A landlord's request to review an order was denied because their agent's mistake at the hearing was not considered a 'serious error' by the LTB.
Digiandomenico v Tripp
LTB denies a landlord's second request to review a decision, citing procedural rules that prohibit multiple reviews of the same order.
An Oshawa tenant's request to review an eviction order for over $15,000 in rent arrears is denied by the LTB.
CAPREIT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v ELUKI
Oshawa tenant's second request to review a non-payment eviction order is denied by the LTB, which confirmed the original decision and advised the tenant to appeal to the Divisional Court.
ALMAJNI v PHILLIPS
Tenant's attempt to overturn a consent eviction order by claiming mental distress during the hearing is denied by the LTB.
Unlock Full Access to Harry Cho's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Harry Cho typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Latest Insights from Our Blog
Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions
Short-Term Rentals and the LTB: When Airbnb Meets Ontario's Rental Laws
Navigate the complex intersection of short-term rentals, municipal bylaws, and Ontario's Residential Tenancies Act. Learn when the LTB has jurisdiction, how Airbnb affects tenancy rights, and what landlords and tenants need to know about this evolving legal landscape.
Substantial Interference and Nuisance: When Tenant Behavior Crosses the Line
Explore what constitutes substantial interference under Ontario's RTA through real LTB cases, examining noise complaints, property damage, overcrowding, and other disruptive behaviors that can lead to eviction.
Eviction Relief: Who Is Eligible and How It Is Granted in Ontario
A comprehensive guide to understanding relief from eviction at Ontario's Landlord and Tenant Board, including eligibility criteria, types of relief available, and real case examples showing when relief is granted or denied.
Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered
Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.
Find Legal Professionals
Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.
Browse ProfessionalsPost Your Legal Needs
Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.
Post a BountyJoin thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform